French Court Rules That Lawsuit Between Monet Heirs and Wildenstein & Co. Gallery Can Proceed
A French judge has ruled that a judicial court in Rouen, Normandy, can proceed with a lawsuit brought by heirs of Claude Monet against Wildenstein & Co. The complaint concerns a 2004 exchange in which Monet’s great-nephew traded a rare Monet portrait of the artist’s father—Adolphe Monet Reading in a Garden (1867)—for five works provided by dealer Guy Wildenstein, including another Monet, Marine, Amsterdam (1874), plus paintings by artists such as Pierre Bonnard and Alfred Sisley. The family alleges it discovered in 2019, when attempting to sell Marine, Amsterdam, that the painting was seriously damaged due to a prior transfer from its original wooden support that distorted the canvas, and it seeks to annul the 2004 agreement or at minimum recover the Monet’s estimated $3 million value. Guy Wildenstein, who stepped down as gallery president late last year and was succeeded by his son David, was found guilty of tax fraud in 2024; the Monet heirs claim the gallery was not honest in the transaction.
From This Briefing
This story was covered in Protests, Lawsuits, and the Art Market’s Secrets